|
|
|
|
v a r i a t i o n s a n d f u g u e s Instrumentation:
2.2.2.2/2.2/Timps.Hrp/Str
Duration:
11’
Performance
details:
09.05.2002,
Leeds University, Leeds University Chamber Orchestra, Benjamin Oliver; cond. Recording
details:
as performance Click
here to hear an excerpt
Click hear to see sketches For details of hiring the sheet music,
please contact David This composition was written in
response to the LUUMS composition competition and is very much composed
with the standards and resources of a student orchestra in mind. It is largely
in the acoustic mode and organically based around the 8-bar phrase announced by
the 2nd violins and violas at bar 76. The most important
characteristics here are the melodic contour and rhythm of the first two bars
and the last two bars of the phrase, and the drone of a fifth. These eight bars
shall be termed the original phrase. In the Allegro Moderato
introduction, elements of the original phrase are hinted at. The strings
pre-empt the dotted note and the drone, while the more liberal harp part
underlines the importance of scalar movement to the piece. The horns suggest the
melodic contour of the opening bars of the original phase, and the
trumpets and oboes develop this motif. The violin solos are taken from bar 7 of
the original phrase. After the 2nd violins and
violas fully expose the original phrase, it is then repeated, though
varied in rhythm slightly. The original phrase is in fact never repeated
in the same way in the whole piece. The phrase statements are anwserd at bar 94,
using a mixture of elements from bars 2 and 7 from the original phrase,
while the accompaniment develops the drone. At bar 110, a variation the original
phrase is stated on a different degree of the mode and again at bar 119. A
kind of ‘second subject’ is introduced at bar 141, using augmented
characteristics of the original phrase. The first 2 bars of the original
phrase are built up canonically at bar 165 and a climax is reached at bar
181. Here the tempo reverts to Allegro
Moderato, and material form the introduction section is brought back. The
violins use the horns’ and then the cellos’ material, while the oboes and
brass use that of the harp. The Db in bar 203 signifies a change of mode. The
pitch construction of the acoustic mode (on C) means that if one substitutes the
D for a Db and Eb, the result is an octatonic mode. Similarly, if one
substitutes the G and A for an Ab, the result is a whole-tone mode. This is why
the composition is a set of variations on the actual acoustic mode itself, not
just the original phrase. At 203 then, we move into the octatonic mode,
and eth first fugue begins at bar 213, using motific elements from the original
phrase. The subject line is answered and then stated again at bar 249. It is
next stated at bar 289, then at bar 308, this time in the whole-tone mode. It
returns to octatonisism at bar 325, and again to the whole-tone at bar 344. All
‘modulations’ between the octatonic and whole-tone modes are made through
the ‘pivot’ notes of C, E, F# and Bb, notes common to all modes in the
piece. A second fugue begins at bar 365, using
the original phrase as it’s subject, back in the acoustic mode. The
fugue entries journey through the cycle of fifths to start on every degree of
the mode to eventually return to C at bar 414. Here the fugue subject is set
augmented against the original rhythmic values. Bar 446 sees kind of recapitulation of
the original phrase, and a variation of the ‘second subject’ appears
at bar 466. Another canonic flourish leads to the tutti climax at bar 506, only
to be followed by the rather pathetic sounds of the clarinets and harp. In turn
this is answered by a unison fortissimo to end the piece. Variations and Fugues was awarded 1st prize
in the Leeds University Composition Competition in 2002. |